Dr. Franz Götz-Hahn

Team leader: AI for Motion (AIM)

Email: franz.goetz-hahn[at]uni-kassel[dot]de

Website: Franz Götz-Hahn

Publications

[ 2024 ]
[ 2023 ]

2024[ to top ]

Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization through Machine Learning-Supported Multiphysics Simulation. Botache, Diego; Decke, Jens; Ripken, Winfried; Dornipati, Abhinay; Götz-Hahn, Franz; Ayeb, Mohamed; Sick, Bernhard. In arXiv e-prints, bl arXiv:2309.13179v2. 2024.
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
This paper presents a methodological framework for training, self-optimising, and self-organising surrogate models to approximate and speed up multiobjective optimisation of technical systems based on multiphysics simulations. At the hand of two real-world datasets, we illustrate that surrogate models can be trained on relatively small amounts of data to approximate the underlying simulations accurately. Including explainable AI techniques allow for highlighting feature relevancy or dependencies and supporting the possible extension of the used datasets. One of the datasets was created for this paper and is made publicly available for the broader scientific community. Extensive experiments combine four machine learning and deep learning algorithms with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm. The performance of the combined training and optimisation pipeline is evaluated by verifying the generated Pareto-optimal results using the ground truth simulations. The results from our pipeline and a comprehensive evaluation strategy show the potential for efficiently acquiring solution candidates in multiobjective optimisation tasks by reducing the number of simulations and conserving a higher prediction accuracy, i.e., with a MAPE score under 5% for one of the presented use cases.
@article{botache2024enhancing, abstract = {This paper presents a methodological framework for training, self-optimising, and self-organising surrogate models to approximate and speed up multiobjective optimisation of technical systems based on multiphysics simulations. At the hand of two real-world datasets, we illustrate that surrogate models can be trained on relatively small amounts of data to approximate the underlying simulations accurately. Including explainable AI techniques allow for highlighting feature relevancy or dependencies and supporting the possible extension of the used datasets. One of the datasets was created for this paper and is made publicly available for the broader scientific community. Extensive experiments combine four machine learning and deep learning algorithms with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm. The performance of the combined training and optimisation pipeline is evaluated by verifying the generated Pareto-optimal results using the ground truth simulations. The results from our pipeline and a comprehensive evaluation strategy show the potential for efficiently acquiring solution candidates in multiobjective optimisation tasks by reducing the number of simulations and conserving a higher prediction accuracy, i.e., with a MAPE score under 5% for one of the presented use cases.}, author = {Botache, Diego and Decke, Jens and Ripken, Winfried and Dornipati, Abhinay and Götz-Hahn, Franz and Ayeb, Mohamed and Sick, Bernhard}, journal = {arXiv e-prints}, keywords = {itegpub}, pages = {arXiv:2309.13179v2}, title = {Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization through Machine Learning-Supported Multiphysics Simulation}, year = 2024 }
%0 Journal Article %1 botache2024enhancing %A Botache, Diego %A Decke, Jens %A Ripken, Winfried %A Dornipati, Abhinay %A Götz-Hahn, Franz %A Ayeb, Mohamed %A Sick, Bernhard %D 2024 %J arXiv e-prints %P arXiv:2309.13179v2 %T Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization through Machine Learning-Supported Multiphysics Simulation %U https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13179 %X This paper presents a methodological framework for training, self-optimising, and self-organising surrogate models to approximate and speed up multiobjective optimisation of technical systems based on multiphysics simulations. At the hand of two real-world datasets, we illustrate that surrogate models can be trained on relatively small amounts of data to approximate the underlying simulations accurately. Including explainable AI techniques allow for highlighting feature relevancy or dependencies and supporting the possible extension of the used datasets. One of the datasets was created for this paper and is made publicly available for the broader scientific community. Extensive experiments combine four machine learning and deep learning algorithms with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm. The performance of the combined training and optimisation pipeline is evaluated by verifying the generated Pareto-optimal results using the ground truth simulations. The results from our pipeline and a comprehensive evaluation strategy show the potential for efficiently acquiring solution candidates in multiobjective optimisation tasks by reducing the number of simulations and conserving a higher prediction accuracy, i.e., with a MAPE score under 5% for one of the presented use cases.

2023[ to top ]

It is the habit not the handle that affects tooth brushing. Results of a randomised counterbalanced cross over study. Deinzer, Renate; Eidenhardt, Zdenka; Sohrabi, Keywan; Stenger, Manuel; Kraft, Dominik; Sick, Bernhard; Götz-Hahn, Franz; Bottenbruch, Carlotta; Berneburg, Nils; Weik, Ulrike. In Research Square. 2023.
- [ Abstract ]
- [ BibTeX ]
- [ EndNote ]
- [ URL ]
Objective: To assess the effect of the toothbrush handle on video-observed toothbrushing behaviour and toothbrushing effectiveness Methods: This is a randomized counterbalanced cross-over study. N = 50 university students brushed their teeth at two occasions, one week apart, using either a commercial ergonomically designed manual toothbrush (MT) or Brushalyze V1 (BV1), a manual toothbrush with a thick cylindrical handle without any specific ergonomic features. Brushing behaviour was video-analysed. Plaque was assessed at the second occasion immediately after brushing. Participants directly compared the two brushes regarding their handling and compared them to the brushed they used at home. Results: The study participants found the BV1 significantly more cumbersome than the M1 or their brush at home. (p < 0.05). However, correlation analyses revealed a strong consistency of brushing behavior with the two brushes (0.71 < r < 0.91). Means differed only slightly (all d < 0.36). These differences became statistically significant only for the brushing time at inner surfaces (d = 0.31 p = 0.03) and horizontal movements at inner surfaces (d = 0.35, p = 0.02). Plaque levels at the gingival margins did not differ while slightly more plaque persisted at the more coronal aspects of the crown after brushing with BV1 (d = 0.592; p 0.042) Discussion: The results of the study indicate that the brushing handle does not play a major role in brushing behavior or brushing effectiveness.
@article{deinzer2023it, abstract = {Objective: To assess the effect of the toothbrush handle on video-observed toothbrushing behaviour and toothbrushing effectiveness Methods: This is a randomized counterbalanced cross-over study. N = 50 university students brushed their teeth at two occasions, one week apart, using either a commercial ergonomically designed manual toothbrush (MT) or Brushalyze V1 (BV1), a manual toothbrush with a thick cylindrical handle without any specific ergonomic features. Brushing behaviour was video-analysed. Plaque was assessed at the second occasion immediately after brushing. Participants directly compared the two brushes regarding their handling and compared them to the brushed they used at home. Results: The study participants found the BV1 significantly more cumbersome than the M1 or their brush at home. (p < 0.05). However, correlation analyses revealed a strong consistency of brushing behavior with the two brushes (0.71 < r < 0.91). Means differed only slightly (all d < 0.36). These differences became statistically significant only for the brushing time at inner surfaces (d = 0.31 p = 0.03) and horizontal movements at inner surfaces (d = 0.35, p = 0.02). Plaque levels at the gingival margins did not differ while slightly more plaque persisted at the more coronal aspects of the crown after brushing with BV1 (d = 0.592; p 0.042) Discussion: The results of the study indicate that the brushing handle does not play a major role in brushing behavior or brushing effectiveness.}, author = {Deinzer, Renate and Eidenhardt, Zdenka and Sohrabi, Keywan and Stenger, Manuel and Kraft, Dominik and Sick, Bernhard and Götz-Hahn, Franz and Bottenbruch, Carlotta and Berneburg, Nils and Weik, Ulrike}, journal = {Research Square}, keywords = {itegpub}, note = {(preprint)}, title = {It is the habit not the handle that affects tooth brushing. Results of a randomised counterbalanced cross over study}, year = 2023 }
%0 Journal Article %1 deinzer2023it %A Deinzer, Renate %A Eidenhardt, Zdenka %A Sohrabi, Keywan %A Stenger, Manuel %A Kraft, Dominik %A Sick, Bernhard %A Götz-Hahn, Franz %A Bottenbruch, Carlotta %A Berneburg, Nils %A Weik, Ulrike %D 2023 %J Research Square %R 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3491691/v1 %T It is the habit not the handle that affects tooth brushing. Results of a randomised counterbalanced cross over study %U https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3491691/v1 %X Objective: To assess the effect of the toothbrush handle on video-observed toothbrushing behaviour and toothbrushing effectiveness Methods: This is a randomized counterbalanced cross-over study. N = 50 university students brushed their teeth at two occasions, one week apart, using either a commercial ergonomically designed manual toothbrush (MT) or Brushalyze V1 (BV1), a manual toothbrush with a thick cylindrical handle without any specific ergonomic features. Brushing behaviour was video-analysed. Plaque was assessed at the second occasion immediately after brushing. Participants directly compared the two brushes regarding their handling and compared them to the brushed they used at home. Results: The study participants found the BV1 significantly more cumbersome than the M1 or their brush at home. (p < 0.05). However, correlation analyses revealed a strong consistency of brushing behavior with the two brushes (0.71 < r < 0.91). Means differed only slightly (all d < 0.36). These differences became statistically significant only for the brushing time at inner surfaces (d = 0.31 p = 0.03) and horizontal movements at inner surfaces (d = 0.35, p = 0.02). Plaque levels at the gingival margins did not differ while slightly more plaque persisted at the more coronal aspects of the crown after brushing with BV1 (d = 0.592; p 0.042) Discussion: The results of the study indicate that the brushing handle does not play a major role in brushing behavior or brushing effectiveness.